A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Magnetic Resonance Imaging With a Novel Hip Flexion Scanning Position for Diagnosing Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy




AuthorsJokela, Aleksi; Niemi, Pekka; Koski, Ilona; Kosola, Jussi; Valle, Xavier; Pruna, Ricard; Orava, Sakari; Pedret, Carles; Balius, Ramon; Pasta, Giulio; Sinikumpu, Juha-Jaakko; Mäkelä, Keijo; Lempainen, Lasse

PublisherSage Publications, Inc.

Publication year2024

JournalOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Journal name in sourceOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine

Journal acronymOrthop J Sports Med

Article number23259671241265130

Volume12

Issue9

ISSN2325-9671

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241265130

Web address https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241265130

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/458295213


Abstract

Background:

Making a diagnosis of proximal hamstring tendinopathy (PHT) may be challenging, as patients with correlating clinical symptoms may have normal or minimal findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a novel hip flexion (HF) scanning position on the MRI diagnosis of PHT. It was hypothesized that the HF position, which simulates the symptom-provoking sitting position, would reveal PHT pathology more accurately than the standard scanning position.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Patients with chronic PHT symptoms were included. Chronicity was defined as symptoms that were present for >3 months. Each patient underwent an MRI in 2 parts: (1) the standard pelvic examination in the supine position and (2) the novel HF position in which the patient lays on his or her side with the hip at 90° of flexion. Tendon insertion areas of the semimembranosus and the biceps femoris were analyzed independently by 2 experienced musculoskeletal radiologists, and the findings were classified as normal, tendinosis, or rupture. The MRI findings for both the standard and HF positions were compared in every patient, and the percentage of different diagnoses between the 2 MRI positions was reported.

Results:

In total, 38 patients (67 tendons) were analyzed. In 71% of the patients, the HF position revealed more severe injury than the standard position. The HF position showed a rupture in 16% of the tendons, with findings classified as tendinosis in the standard position. Of the tendons diagnosed as normal in the standard position, 6% were classified as rupture and 11% as tendinosis in the HF position.

Conclusion:

The novel HF scanning position offered additional value in the diagnosis of PHT in symptomatic patients when compared with the standard hip-in-neutral position. This position can improve the diagnostics of PHT, especially if an athlete or an active patient with gluteal area pain has normal or minimal MRI findings in the standard position.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:15