A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

The Gender-Equality Paradox in Intraindividual Academic Strengths: A Cross-Temporal Analysis




AuthorsBalducci, Marco; Larose, Marie-Pier; Stoet, Gijsbert; Geary, David C.

PublisherSAGE Publications

Publication year2024

JournalPsychological Science

Journal name in sourcePsychological science

Journal acronymPsychol Sci

Volume35

Issue11

First page 1246

Last page1259

ISSN0956-7976

eISSN1467-9280

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/09567976241271330

Web address https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976241271330

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/457850656


Abstract
Independent of overall achievement, girls' intraindividual academic strength is typically reading, whereas boys' strength is typically mathematics or science. Sex differences in intraindividual strengths are associated with educational and occupational sex disparities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. Paradoxically, these sex differences are larger in more gender-equal countries, but the stability of this paradox is debated. We assessed the stability of the gender-equality paradox in intraindividual strengths, and its relation to wealth, by analyzing the academic achievement of nearly 2.5 million adolescents across 85 countries and regions in five waves (from 2006 to 2018) of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Girls' intraindividual strength in reading and boys' strength in mathematics and science were stable across countries and waves. Boys' advantage in science as an intraindividual strength was larger in more gender-equal countries, whereas girls' advantage in reading was larger in wealthier countries. The results have implications for reducing sex disparities in STEM fields.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Funding This research was supported by the Finnish Cultural Foundation (Grant No. 00220166).


Last updated on 2025-27-02 at 09:02