A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in long covid shows the presence of dysautonomia or chronotropic incompetence independent of subjective exercise intolerance and fatigue




AuthorsMustonen, Timo; Kanerva, Mari; Luukkonen, Ritva; Lantto, Hanna; Uusitalo, Arja; Piirilä, Päivi

PublisherBMC

Publishing placeLONDON

Publication year2024

Journal: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Journal acronymBMC CARDIOVASC DISOR

Article number 413

Volume24

Issue1

Number of pages12

eISSN1471-2261

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04081-w

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Open Access publication channel

Web address https://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-024-04081-w

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/457733953


Abstract

Background After COVID-19 infection, 10-20% of patients suffer from varying symptoms lasting more than 12 weeks (Long COVID, LC). Exercise intolerance and fatigue are common in LC. The aim was to measure the maximal exercise capacity of the LC patients with these symptoms and to analyze whether this capacity was related to heart rate (HR) responses at rest and during exercise and recovery, to find out possible sympathetic overactivity, dysautonomia or chronotropic incompetence.

Methods Cardiopulmonary exercise test was conducted on 101 LC patients, who were admitted to exercise testing. The majority of them (86%) had been treated at home during their acute COVID-19 infection. Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), maximal power during the last 4 min of exercise (Wlast4), HRs, and other exercise test variables were compared between those with or without subjective exercise intolerance, fatigue, or both.

Results The measurements were performed in mean 12.7 months (SD 5.75) after COVID-19 infection in patients with exercise intolerance (group EI, 19 patients), fatigue (group F, 31 patients), their combination (group EI + F, 37 patients), or neither (group N, 14 patients). Exercise capacity was, in the mean, normal in all symptom groups and did not significantly differ among them. HRs were higher in group EI + F than in group N at maximum exercise (169/min vs. 158/min, p = 0.034) and 10 min after exercise (104/min vs. 87/min, p = 0.028). Independent of symptoms, 12 patients filled the criteria of dysautonomia associated with slightly decreased Wlast4 (73% vs. 91% of sex, age, height, and weight-based reference values p = 0.017) and 13 filled the criteria of chronotropic incompetence with the lowest Wlast4 (63% vs. 93%, p < 0.001), VO2peak (70% vs. 94%, p < 0.001), the lowest increase of systolic blood pressure (50 mmHg vs. 67 mmHg, p = 0.001), and the greatest prevalence of slight ECG-findings (p = 0.017) compared to patients without these features. The highest prevalence of chronotropic incompetence was seen in the group N (p = 0.022).

Conclusions This study on LC patients with different symptoms showed that cardiopulmonary exercise capacity was in mean normal, with increased sympathetic activity in most patients. However, we identified subgroups with dysautonomia or chronotropic incompetence with a lowered exercise capacity as measured by Wlast4 or VO2peak. Subjective exercise intolerance and fatigue poorly foresaw the level of exercise capacity. The results could be used to plan the rehabilitation from LC and for selection of the patients suitable for it.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Helsinki University Central Hospital support Y780023041. Open Access funding provided by University of Helsinki (including Helsinki University Central Hospital).


Last updated on 28/11/2024 12:15:54 PM