A2 Refereed review article in a scientific journal

The case for balloon eustachian tuboplasty in children




AuthorsToivonen, Joonas; Poe, Dennis

PublisherLippincott

Publication year2024

JournalCurrent Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

Journal name in sourceCurrent opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery

Journal acronymCurr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

Volume32

Issue5

First page 346

Last page351

ISSN1068-9508

eISSN1531-6998

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000991

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11495533/


Abstract

Purpose of review

Balloon dilation of the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube has increasingly gained acceptance among otolaryngologists in the treatment of obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction. There is however little data on the procedure performed in children. The purpose of this study is to review the recent developments regarding balloon dilation in pediatric patients.

Recent findings

Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube is safe in pediatric patients. The effects of the procedure are durable during long term follow-up. Diagnosing obstructive dysfunction remains challenging. There is no single test or questionnaire for diagnosing the condition; instead a series of appropriate tests should be used. The pediatric Eustachian tube is very responsive to the effects of balloon dilation. While the treatment is effective, overtreatment can have unwanted results such as patulous symptoms. Reducing the time of dilation should therefore be considered.

Summary

Otolaryngologists performing the procedure should be familiar with the effects of balloon dilation on the pediatric Eustachian tube and consider altering the duration of dilation accordingly. Further studies are needed especially regarding patient selection, optimal age for dilation and balloon parameters for pediatrics (e.g. dimensions, inflation duration, inflation pressure).


Funding information in the publication
Financial support and sponsorship: This work received no specific funding. Conflicts of interest: Dennis Poe is a consultant for Acclarent.


Last updated on 2025-21-03 at 11:34