A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Psychotherapy use among migrants: a register-based longitudinal study




TekijätLehti, Venla; Kieseppä, Valentina; Gissler, Mika; Suvisaari, Jaana; Markkula, Niina

KustantajaBMJ PUBLISHING GROUP

KustannuspaikkaLONDON

Julkaisuvuosi2025

Lehti:Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiJOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH

Lehden akronyymiJ EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H

Vuosikerta79

Numero1

Aloitussivu49

Lopetussivu55

Sivujen määrä7

ISSN0143-005X

eISSN1470-2738

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2024-222330

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2024-222330

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/457680052


Tiivistelmä

Background

Migrants use less mental health services compared with non-migrant populations, but there is very little information on the use of long-term psychotherapy among migrants. Finnish register data allow for studying the whole migrant population in Finland and collecting data on all publicly supported rehabilitative psychotherapy.

Methods

This study is based on a sample of migrants (n=185 605) and Finnish-born controls (n=185 605). Participants who had received reimbursements for rehabilitative psychotherapy during 2007-2020 were identified from a register maintained by the Social Insurance Institution of Finland. Cox regression analysis was used to study the effect of migrant status on the time until the start of therapy. Multinomial logistic regression was used to study the association between migrant status and the number of psychotherapy sessions.

Results

Finnish-born participants received psychotherapy more often (n=7258) than migrants (n=1516). The adjusted HR for initiating psychotherapy among migrants compared with Finnish-born individuals was 0.27 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.28). Migrants from sub-Saharan Africa and Asia and recently arrived migrants were least likely to receive psychotherapy. Migrants were more likely to receive short treatment periods than Finnish-born controls.

Conclusion

Lower use of rehabilitative psychotherapy among migrant population in Finland is not likely to reflect lower need for treatment. More efforts are needed to promote equal access to psychotherapy.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This study was financially supported by Jalmari and Rauha Ahokas Foundation and the State Research Funding for University Level Health Research, Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District.


Last updated on 2025-27-03 at 15:55