A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Evidence-based scientific thinking and decision-making in everyday life
Tekijät: Dawson, Caitlin; Julku, Hanna; Pihlajamäki, Milla; Kaakinen, Johanna K.; Schooler, Jonathan W.; Simola, Jaana
Kustantaja: SPRINGER
Kustannuspaikka: NEW YORK
Julkaisuvuosi: 2024
Journal: Cognitive research
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS
Lehden akronyymi: COGN RES
Artikkelin numero: 50
Vuosikerta: 9
Numero: 1
Sivujen määrä: 37
ISSN: 2365-7464
eISSN: 2365-7464
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00578-2
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00578-2
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/457612905
In today's knowledge economy, it is critical to make decisions based on high-quality evidence. Science-related decision-making is thought to rely on a complex interplay of reasoning skills, cognitive styles, attitudes, and motivations toward information. By investigating the relationship between individual differences and behaviors related to evidence-based decision-making, our aim was to better understand how adults engage with scientific information in everyday life. First, we used a data-driven exploratory approach to identify four latent factors in a large set of measures related to cognitive skills and epistemic attitudes. The resulting structure suggests that key factors include curiosity and positive attitudes toward science, prosociality, cognitive skills, and openmindedness to new information. Second, we investigated whether these factors predicted behavior in a naturalistic decision-making task. In the task, participants were introduced to a real science-related petition and were asked to read six online articles related to the petition, which varied in scientific quality, while deciding how to vote. We demonstrate that curiosity and positive science attitudes, cognitive flexibility, prosociality and emotional states, were related to engaging with information and discernment of evidence reliability. We further found that that social authority is a powerful cue for source credibility, even above the actual quality and relevance of the sources. Our results highlight that individual motivating factors toward information engagement, like curiosity, and social factors such as social authority are important drivers of how adults judge the credibility of everyday sources of scientific information.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
Open Access funding provided by University of Helsinki (including Helsinki University Central Hospital). Funding for this study is from the Strategic Research Council (STN) operating in connection with the Academy of Finland to the FINSCI consortium under the LITERACY programme with funding numbers 335233 to J.K.K. at the University of Turku and 335236 and 358272 to J.S. at the University of Helsinki.
