A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Tendon graft through the coracoid tunnel versus under the coracoid for coracoclavicular/acromioclavicular reconstruction shows no difference in radiographic or patient-reported outcomes




AuthorsRanne, Juha O.; Kainonen, Terho U.; Kanto, Kari J.; Lehtinen, Janne T.; Niemi, Pekka T.; Scheinin, Harry

PublisherSpringer Nature

Publication year2024

JournalArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Journal name in sourceArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery

Journal acronymArch Orthop Trauma Surg

Volume144

Issue8

First page 3491

Last page3501

ISSN0936-8051

eISSN1434-3916

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05461-9

Web address https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05461-9

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/457298114


Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this prospective study was to report the outcomes of two different methods in CC and AC reconstruction for the treatment of AC separation using a tendon graft and knot-hiding titanium clavicular implant.

Materials and methods: Twenty-seven patients with Rockwood grade III and V acromioclavicular (AC) separations were randomized into two groups. The primary outcome was whether taking the tendon graft through the coracoid risked a fracture. The following were secondary outcomes: follow-up of clavicular wound healing and Nottingham Clavicle score, Constant score, and Simple Shoulder Test results obtained preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. The anteroposterior radiographic change between the clavicular and coracoid cortexes and the clavicular tunnel diameter was measured postoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. General patient satisfaction with the outcome (poor, fair, good, or excellent) was assessed 2 years postoperatively.

Results: No coracoid fractures were detected. No issues in clavicular wound healing were detected. The mean Nottingham Clavicle score increased from a preoperative mean of 42.42 ± 13.42 to 95.31 ± 14.20 (P < 0.00). The Constant score increased from a preoperative mean of 50.81 ± 17.77 to 96.42 ± 11.51 (P < 0.001). The Simple Shoulder Test score increased from a preoperative mean of 7.50 ± 2.45 to 11.77 ± 1.18 (P < 0.001). The changes were significant. The coracoclavicular distance increased from 11.88 ± 4.00 to 14.19 ± 4.71 mm (P = 0.001), which was significant. The clavicular drill hole diameter increased from 5.5 to a mean of 8.00 ± 0.75 mm. General patient satisfaction was excellent.

Conclusions: There were no significant differences between the two groups. There were no implant related complications in the clavicular wound healing. The results support the notion that good results are achieved by reconstructing both the CC and AC ligaments with a tendon graft.

Study registration: This clinical trial was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-28-02 at 10:28