A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Factors associated with peptic ulcer perforations in Uganda : a multi-hospital cross-sectional study
Tekijät: Edyedu, Isaac; Okedi, Francis Xaviour; Muhumuza, Joshua; Asiimwe, Daniel; Laker, Goretty; Lule, Herman
Kustantaja: BioMed Central
Julkaisuvuosi: 2024
Journal: BMC Gastroenterology
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: BMC gastroenterology
Lehden akronyymi: BMC Gastroenterol
Artikkelin numero: 199
Vuosikerta: 24
Numero: 1
ISSN: 1471-230X
eISSN: 1471-230X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03285-w
Verkko-osoite: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11181620/
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/456990477
Introduction: Perforated peptic ulcer is the worst complication of peptic ulcer disease whose burden is disproportionately higher in low-income settings. However, there is paucity of published data on the patterns of perforated peptic ulcer in the region. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with anatomical patterns of peptic ulcer perforation, as well as the clinical, socio-demographic, and anatomical patterns among patients in Uganda.
Methods: This was a cross sectional study that enrolled 81 consecutive patients with perforated peptic ulcers. Using a structured pretested questionnaire the social demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained. At surgery, the patterns of the perforations were determined. Logistic regression was done in SPSS version 22 to determine the factors associated with the anatomical patterns.
Results: Perforated peptic ulcer disease was more prevalent among males (79.5%), peasants (56.8%) and those from rural areas (65.4%). Majority of study participants were of blood group O (43.2%). Gastric perforations were more common (74.1%). Majority of the perforations were found anteriorly (81.5%). Being a casual laborer was independently associated with lower odds of having a gastric perforation compared to being a peasant farmer (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Public health campaigns aimed at prevention of peptic ulcer perforations should prioritize the males, peasants and those living in rural areas. When a patient in our setting is suspected to have a peptic ulcer perforation, the anterior part of the stomach should be considered as the most likely site involved more so in peasant farmers.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in public, commercial, or not for profit sectors.