A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

A Comprehensive Approach to PROMs in Elective Orthopedic Surgery : Comparing Effect Sizes across Patient Subgroups




AuthorsÄärimaa, Ville; Kohtala, Karita; Rantalaiho, Ida; Ekman, Elina; Mäkelä, Keijo; Taskinen, Hanna-Stiina; Ryösä, Anssi; Kostensalo, Joel; Meronen, Saara; Laaksonen, Inari

PublisherMPDI

Publication year2024

JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine

Journal name in sourceJournal of clinical medicine

Journal acronymJ Clin Med

Article number3073

Volume13

Issue11

eISSN2077-0383

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113073

Web address https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113073

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/456980281


Abstract

Background: There is limited knowledge regarding the comparative patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and effect sizes (ESs) across orthopedic elective surgery.

Methods: All patient data between January 2020 and December 2022 were collected, and treatment outcomes assessed as a PROM difference between baseline and one-year follow-up. The cohort was divided into subgroups (hand, elbow, shoulder, spine, hip, knee, and foot/ankle). The PROM ESs were calculated for each patient separately, and patients with ES > 0.5 were considered responders.

Results: In total, 7695 patients were operated on. The mean ES across all patient groups was 1.81 (SD 1.41), and the largest ES was observed in shoulder patients and the smallest in hand patients. Overall, shoulder, hip, and knee patients had a larger ES compared to hand, spine, and foot/ankle patients (p < 0.0001). The proportion of positive responders ranged between 91-94% in the knee, shoulder, and hip, and 69-70% in the hand, spine, and foot/ankle subgroups.

Conclusions: The ESs are generally high throughout elective orthopedic surgery. However, based on our institutional observations, shoulder, hip, and knee patients experience larger treatment effects compared to hand, spine, and foot/ankle patients, among whom there are also more non-responders. The expected treatment outcomes should be clearly communicated to patients when considering elective surgery. Because of the study limitations, the results should be approached with some caution.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
This research was funded by Turku University Hospital government research funding KP13804.


Last updated on 2025-11-02 at 16:03