D1 Article in a professional journal
6080 Tritanium-kuppikomponentin pysyvyystulokset primaarissa lonkan tekonivelleikkauksessa Suomen tekonivel-rekisteriin perustuen
Authors: Antton Palomäki, Matias Hemmilä, Inari Laaksonen, Markus Matilainen, Antti Eskelinen, Jaason Haapakoski, Ari-Pekka Puhto, Jukka Kettunen, Mikko Manninen, Keijo T Mäkelä
Publication year: 2019
Journal: Suomen ortopedia ja traumatologia
Journal name in source: Suomen ortopedia ja traumatologia - SOT
Volume: 42
Issue: 2
First page : 141
Last page: 145
ISSN: 0780-671X
Web address : http://www.soy.fi/files/sot42_2_2019webfinal.pdf
Background: Ultraporous highly porous-coated acetabulum components
were introduced to further enhance osteointegration of uncemented cups
in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Implant survival data on these new devices is
scarce, however. The aim of our study was to assess survivorship of ultraporous
Tritanium cups (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA) in a population-based register study.
Methods: Data on 6,080 primary THAs with a Tritanium cup and 25,670 THAs
with a conventional uncemented cup (reference group) were collected from the
Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 1.1.2009 to 31.12.2017. Kaplan-Meier survival
estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The endpoint was
revision for any reason or for aseptic loosening of the cup. Revision was defined
as a change or removal of at least one component. Revision risks were assessed
using Cox multiple regression model. The variables assessed in the Cox model
were age group, gender, diagnosis, femoral head size, operated side, operation
year, and fixation of the stem. Because the proportional hazards assumption of
the Cox model was not fulfilled the follow-up time was divided into three time
periods: 0-2years, 2-4 years, and over 4 years.
Results: The 7-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship of the Tritanium group (94.0%
(95% CI 92.9-94.9)) was inferior compared to that of the reference group (95.6%
(CI 95.3-95.9)) for any reason of revision. In the Cox regression analysis the
Tritanium group had an increased risk of revision for any reason compared
to the reference group for the time period 4 years and over (HR 3.12, (95% CI
1.82-5.25, p<0.001)). The Tritanium group had an increased risk of revision for
aseptic loosening of the cup compared to the reference group both for the time
period from 0 to 2 years (HR 3.80, (95% CI 1.76-8.24, p<0.001)), and for the time
period from 2 to 4 years (HR 11.2, (95% CI 3.28-38.0, p<0.001)).
Conclusions: The use of the ultraporous-coated Tritanium cup for primary THA
does not provide an advantage over conventional uncemented cups.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic level III