A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Treating gambling disorder with as needed administration of intranasal naloxone: A pilot study to evaluate acceptability, feasibility and outcomes




TekijätSari Castrén, Niklas Mäkelä, Janne Haikola, Anne H Salonen, Roger Crystal, Mika Scheinin, Hannu Alho

KustantajaBMJ Publishing Group

Julkaisuvuosi2019

JournalBMJ Open

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiBMJ Open

Vuosikerta9

Numero8

Sivujen määrä10

ISSN2044-6055

eISSN2044-6055

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023728

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/42523543


Tiivistelmä

Background and aim There is growing interest in the use of medication-assisted treatments for gambling disorder (GD). Opioid receptor antagonists are hypothesised to blunt the craving associated with gambling. This study was designed to assess the feasibility of using an intranasal naloxone spray to treat GD.

Design An 8-week, open-label, uncontrolled pilot study.

Setting A single study site in the capital region of Finland.

Subjects Twenty problem gamblers (nine men) were randomised into two groups. Group A (n=10) took one dose into one nostril (2 mg naloxone), as needed, with a maximum of 4 doses/day (max. 8 mg/day). Group B (n=10) took one dose into each nostril (4 mg naloxone) as needed, with a maximum of 4 doses/day (max. 16 mg/day).

Intervention Naloxone hydrochloride nasal spray.

Measures Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention were assessed. Use of study medication, adverse events, gambling frequency and gambling expenditure were recorded in a mobile diary. Problem gambling: South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), depressive symptoms: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and alcohol use: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test were recorded.

Results Study completion rate was 90%. Acceptability and feasibility scores were high. Group B used intranasal naloxone more frequently than group A, and consequently used more naloxone. No serious adverse events were reported. The postintervention SOGS scores were lower (median=4 (IQR=3.75) versus preintervention scores (median=12 (IQR=4.75)). Depressive symptoms were reduced during the trial (preintervention BDI median=9, IQR=9 vs postintervention BDI median=6, IQR=6).

Conclusions The acceptability and feasibility of using intranasal naloxone were high, and no serious adverse events were reported. Preliminary results suggest mixed results in terms of gambling behaviour (ie, reduced frequency but not expenditure) and decreased depressive symptoms.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 14:57