A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Assessment of myocardial viability with [15O]water PET: A validation study in experimental myocardial infarction
Authors: Maria Grönman, Miikka Tarkia, Christoffer Stark, Tommi Vähäsilta, Tuomas Kiviniemi, Mark Lubberink, Paavo Halonen, Antti Kuivanen, Virva Saunavaara, Tuula Tolvanen, Jarmo Teuho, Mika Teräs, Timo Savunen, Mikko Pietilä, Seppo Ylä-Herttuala, Anne Roivainen, Juhani Knuuti, Antti Saraste
Publisher: Springer
Publication year: 2021
Journal: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Journal name in source: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Issue: 28
First page : 1271
Last page: 1280
ISSN: 1071-3581
eISSN: 1532-6551
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01818-5
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/41819261
Background: Assessment of myocardial viability is often needed in patients with chest pain and reduced ejection fraction. We evaluated the performance of reduced resting MBF, perfusable tissue fraction (PTF), and perfusable tissue index (PTI) in the assessment of myocardial viability in a pig model of myocardial infarction (MI).
Methods and results: Pigs underwent resting [15O]water PET perfusion study 12 weeks after surgical (n = 16) or 2 weeks after catheter-based (n = 4) occlusion of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. MBF, PTF, and PTI were compared with volume fraction of MI in matched segments as assessed by triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining of LV slices. MBF and PTF were lower in infarcted than non-infarcted segments. Segmental analysis of MBF showed similar area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, 0.86, and 0.90 with relative MBF, PTF, and PTI for the detection of viable myocardium defined as infarct volume fraction of < 75%. Cut-off values of relative MBF of ≥ 67% and PTF of ≥ 66% resulted in accuracies of 90% and 81%, respectively.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that resting MBF, PTF, and PTI based on [15O]water PET perfusion imaging are useful for the assessment of myocardial viability.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |