A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Assessment of myocardial viability with [15O]water PET: A validation study in experimental myocardial infarction




AuthorsMaria Grönman, Miikka Tarkia, Christoffer Stark, Tommi Vähäsilta, Tuomas Kiviniemi, Mark Lubberink, Paavo Halonen, Antti Kuivanen, Virva Saunavaara, Tuula Tolvanen, Jarmo Teuho, Mika Teräs, Timo Savunen, Mikko Pietilä, Seppo Ylä-Herttuala, Anne Roivainen, Juhani Knuuti, Antti Saraste

PublisherSpringer

Publication year2021

JournalJournal of Nuclear Cardiology

Journal name in sourceJournal of Nuclear Cardiology

Issue28

First page 1271

Last page1280

ISSN1071-3581

eISSN1532-6551

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01818-5

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/41819261


Abstract

Background: Assessment of myocardial viability is often needed in patients with chest pain and reduced ejection fraction. We evaluated the performance of reduced resting MBF, perfusable tissue fraction (PTF), and perfusable tissue index (PTI) in the assessment of myocardial viability in a pig model of myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods and results: Pigs underwent resting [15O]water PET perfusion study 12 weeks after surgical (n = 16) or 2 weeks after catheter-based (n = 4) occlusion of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. MBF, PTF, and PTI were compared with volume fraction of MI in matched segments as assessed by triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining of LV slices. MBF and PTF were lower in infarcted than non-infarcted segments. Segmental analysis of MBF showed similar area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85, 0.86, and 0.90 with relative MBF, PTF, and PTI for the detection of viable myocardium defined as infarct volume fraction of < 75%. Cut-off values of relative MBF of ≥ 67% and PTF of ≥ 66% resulted in accuracies of 90% and 81%, respectively.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that resting MBF, PTF, and PTI based on [15O]water PET perfusion imaging are useful for the assessment of myocardial viability.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 10:59