A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Critical review of the follow-up protocol for head and neck cancer patients




AuthorsKytö E., Haapio E., Minn H., Irjala H.

PublisherCambridge University Press

Publication year2019

JournalJournal of Laryngology and Otology

Journal name in sourceJournal of Laryngology and Otology

Volume133

Issue5

First page 424

Last page429

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215119000811

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/41164431


Abstract

Objective: Head and neck cancer follow-up length, interval and content are controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the follow-up protocol after curative treatment in head and neck cancer patients.

Method: Clinical data of 456 patients with new malignancy of the head and neck from a tertiary care centre district from 1999 to 2008 were analysed. Time from treatment, symptoms and second-line treatment outcomes of patients with recurrent disease were evaluated.

Results: A total of 94 (22 per cent) patients relapsed during the 5-year follow-up period; 90 per cent of recurrences were found within 3 years. Fifty-six per cent of the patients had subjective symptoms indicating a recurrence of the tumour. All recurrent tumours found during routine follow-up visits without symptoms were found within 34 months after completion of treatment.

Conclusion: Routine follow up after three years is questionable; recurrent disease beyond this point was detected in only 2 per cent of patients. In this study, all late tumour recurrences had symptoms of the disease. Easy access to extra follow-up visits when symptoms occur could cover the need for late follow up.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 12:07