A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Critical review of the follow-up protocol for head and neck cancer patients
Authors: Kytö E., Haapio E., Minn H., Irjala H.
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication year: 2019
Journal: Journal of Laryngology and Otology
Journal name in source: Journal of Laryngology and Otology
Volume: 133
Issue: 5
First page : 424
Last page: 429
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215119000811
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/41164431
Objective: Head and neck cancer follow-up length, interval and content are controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the follow-up protocol after curative treatment in head and neck cancer patients.
Method: Clinical data of 456 patients with new malignancy of the head and neck from a tertiary care centre district from 1999 to 2008 were analysed. Time from treatment, symptoms and second-line treatment outcomes of patients with recurrent disease were evaluated.
Results: A total of 94 (22 per cent) patients relapsed during the 5-year follow-up period; 90 per cent of recurrences were found within 3 years. Fifty-six per cent of the patients had subjective symptoms indicating a recurrence of the tumour. All recurrent tumours found during routine follow-up visits without symptoms were found within 34 months after completion of treatment.
Conclusion: Routine follow up after three years is questionable; recurrent disease beyond this point was detected in only 2 per cent of patients. In this study, all late tumour recurrences had symptoms of the disease. Easy access to extra follow-up visits when symptoms occur could cover the need for late follow up.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |