A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Gut inflammation markers, diet, and risk of islet autoimmunity in Finnish children – a nested case-control study




AuthorsSalo Tuuli E.I., Hakola Leena, Niinistö Sari, Takkinen Hanna-Mari, Ahonen Suvi, Puustinen Leena, Ilonen Jorma, Toppari Jorma, Veijola Riitta, Hyöty Heikki, Knip Mikael, Virtanen Suvi M.

PublisherElsevier

Publication year2024

JournalJournal of Nutrition

Journal name in sourceThe Journal of Nutrition

Volume154

Issue7

First page 2244

Last page2254

ISSN0022-3166

eISSN1541-6100

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.05.015

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.05.015

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/404741214


Abstract

Background: Gut dysbiosis and increased intestinal permeability have been reported to precede type 1 diabetes-related autoimmunity. The role of gut inflammation in autoimmunity is not understood.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess whether gut inflammation markers are associated with risk of islet autoimmunity and whether diet is associated with gut inflammation markers.

Methods: A nested case-control sample of 75 case children with islet autoimmunity and 88 control children was acquired from the Finnish Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention cohort. Diet was assessed with 3-d food records, and calprotectin and human β-defensin-2 (HBD-2) were analyzed from stool samples at 6 and 12 mo of age. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used in a matched case-control setting to assess risk of autoimmunity. Analysis of variance, independent samples t test, and a general linear model were used in secondary analyses to test associations of background characteristics and dietary factors with inflammation markers.

Results: In unadjusted analyses, calprotectin was not associated with risk of islet autoimmunity, whereas HBD-2 in the middle (odds ratio [OR]: 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03, 10.08) or highest tertile (OR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.05, 8.69) in comparison to the lowest at 12 mo of age showed borderline association (P-trend = 0.063) with higher risk of islet autoimmunity. Excluding children with cow milk allergy in sensitivity analyses strengthened the association of HBD-2 with islet autoimmunity, whereas adjusting for dietary factors and maternal education weakened it. At age 12 mo, higher fat intake was associated with higher HBD-2 (β: 0.219; 95% CI: 0.110, 0.328) and higher intake of dietary fiber (β: -0.294; 95% CI: -0.510, -0.078), magnesium (β: -0.036; 95% CI: -0.059, -0.014), and potassium (β: -0.003; 95% CI: -0.005, -0.001) with lower HBD-2.

Conclusions: Higher HBD-2 in infancy may be associated with higher risk of islet autoimmunity. Dietary factors play a role in gut inflammatory status.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Supported by the Academy of Finland grants 63672, 79685, 79686, 80846, 201988, 210632, 129492, 126813, 276475, and 339922 (to SMV); the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation (to SMV); the Juho Vainio Foundation (to SMV); the Competitive Research Funding of the Tampere University Hospital grants 9E082, 9F089, 9G087, 9H092, 9J147, 9K149, 9L035, 9L117, 9M029, 9M114, 9N086, 9P017, 9P057, 9R012, 9R055, 9S015, 9S074, 9T072, 9U016, 9U065, 9V012, 9V072, 9X062, 9AA084, 9AB083, and 9AC099 (to SMV); Medical Research Funds of Turku (to JI and JT) and Oulu (to RV) University Hospitals; the European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (supported by EFSD/JDRF/Lilly) (to SMV and HH); the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation grants 197032, 4-1998-274, 4-1999-731, 4-2001-435, 1-SRA-2016-342-M-R, and 1-41 SRA-2019-732-M-B (to JT, MK, RV), the Novo Nordisk Foundation and EU Biomed 2 grant BMH4-CT98-3314 (to JT, MK, and RV); Sigrid Jusélius Foundation (to JI, JT, MK, RV, and HH), and Doctoral Programs for Public Health (to SMV). The supporting sources were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, writing of the report, or restrictions regarding publication.


Last updated on 2025-28-02 at 14:37