A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Functional imaging of localized prostate cancer aggressiveness using 11C-acetate PET/CT and 1H-MR spectroscopy.




AuthorsJambor Ivan, Borra Ronald, Kemppainen Jukka, Lepomäki Virva, Parkkola Ritta, Dean Kirsti, Alanen Kalle, Arponen Evellina, Nurmi Martti, Aronen Hannu Juhani, Minn Heikki

Publication year2010

JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine

Journal acronymJ Nucl Med

Number in series11

Volume51

Issue11

First page 1676

Last page1683

Number of pages8

ISSN0161-5505

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.078667

Web address http://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/51/11/1676.long


Abstract

We assessed the ability of (11)C-acetate PET/CT, MRI, and proton MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) to image localized prostate cancer and detect its aggressiveness, using qualitative and quantitative approaches.



METHODS:

Twenty-one patients with untreated localized prostate cancer, diagnosed using transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, were prospectively enrolled. Cancer laterality was based on the percentage of cancer and the highest Gleason score determined from biopsies. In addition to PET/CT, 3-dimensional (1)H-MRS of the entire prostate volume using a quantitative approach was performed. The imaging and histologic findings of 8 patients undergoing subsequent prostatectomy were compared on a sextant level. For each lobe and sextant, standardized uptake values (SUVs) and (choline + creatine + polyamines)-to-citrate (CCP/C) ratios were obtained from (11)C-acetate PET/CT and (1)H-MRS, respectively. The visual and quantitative findings on PET/CT and MRI data were compared with cancer laterality and aggressiveness based on the Gleason score and with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity and international risk group classification.



RESULTS:

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, on a lobar level using visual analysis, of (11)C-acetate PET/CT were 80%, 29%, 71%, respectively, and 89%, 29%, 79%, respectively, using contrast-enhanced MRI. The sensitivity and accuracy of (11)C-acetate PET/CT decreased to 64% and 63% and specificity increased to 62% when sextant analysis was performed. The agreement between prostate cancer laterality based on biopsy findings and visual interpretation of (11)C-acetate PET/CT and contrast-enhanced MRI was similar at 71%. The mean SUV maximum and CCP/C maximum for the dominant tumor lesion were 5.5 and 1.48, respectively, and did not differ significantly from values in the nondominant lobe. The dominant-lesion SUVs or CCP/C values were not associated with histologically determined prostate cancer aggressiveness, nor did PSA velocity correlate with the SUV or CCP/C values from the entire gland.



CONCLUSION:

(11)C-acetate PET/CT, MRI, and (1)H-MRS enable detection of localized prostate cancer with comparable and limited accuracy but fail to provide information on cancer aggressiveness.



 




Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:23