Water distribution in dentin matrices: Bound vs. unbound water




Agee KA, Prakki A, Abu-Haimed T, Naguib GH, Abu Nawareg M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Scheffel DLS, Chen C, Jang SS, Hwang H, Brackett M, Gregoire G, Tay FR, Breschi L, Pashley DH

PublisherELSEVIER SCI LTD

2015

Dental Materials

DENTAL MATERIALS

DENT MATER

31

3

205

216

12

0109-5641

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.007



Signcance. Attempts to remove bound water by evaporation were not very successful. Chemical dehydration with 100% acetone was more successful than 100% ethanol especially the third layer of bound water. Since unbound water represents between 75 and 79% of total matrix water, the more such water can be removed, the more resin can be infiltrated. (C) 2014 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.




Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 14:46