A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Water distribution in dentin matrices: Bound vs. unbound water
Tekijät: Agee KA, Prakki A, Abu-Haimed T, Naguib GH, Abu Nawareg M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Scheffel DLS, Chen C, Jang SS, Hwang H, Brackett M, Gregoire G, Tay FR, Breschi L, Pashley DH
Kustantaja: ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Julkaisuvuosi: 2015
Lehti: Dental Materials
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: DENTAL MATERIALS
Lehden akronyymi: DENT MATER
Vuosikerta: 31
Numero: 3
Aloitussivu: 205
Lopetussivu: 216
Sivujen määrä: 12
ISSN: 0109-5641
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.007
Signcance. Attempts to remove bound water by evaporation were not very successful. Chemical dehydration with 100% acetone was more successful than 100% ethanol especially the third layer of bound water. Since unbound water represents between 75 and 79% of total matrix water, the more such water can be removed, the more resin can be infiltrated. (C) 2014 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Avainsanat:
adhesive dentistry, Bound water, Bulk water, Collagen, Dentin, Hydrogen bonding
