A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

The gatekeeper’s dilemma: Political selection or team effort




AuthorsFiva Jon H, Izzo Federica, Tukiainen Janne

PublisherElsevier

Publication year2024

JournalJournal of Public Economics

Journal name in sourceJournal of Public Economics

Volume234

ISSN0047-2727

eISSN1879-2316

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105133

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105133

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/393424319

Preprint addresshttps://www.etla.fi/julkaisut/working-papers/least-cost-decarbonization-pathways-for-electricity-generation-in-finland-a-convex-quantile-regression-approach/


Abstract
Political parties play a crucial gatekeeping role in elections, including controlling electoral resources, candidate recruitment, and electoral list compositions. In making these strategic choices, parties aim to encourage candidates to invest in the campaign, while also trying to secure advantages for their preferred candidates. We study how parties navigate this trade-off using a specific feature of the Norwegian local electoral system in which parties can give advantaged positions to some candidates in an otherwise open list. Our theory reveals that parties’ ex-ante electoral strength impacts their strategic decisions. Notably, the trade-off is weaker for more popular parties, allowing them to facilitate the election of their preferred candidates without compromising the party’s overall performance. We show empirically that the moral hazard concern is real, and that larger parties are indeed more likely to use their power to make some candidates safe. The advantage of large parties extends further: safeguarding specific candidates enables parties to achieve disproportionately favorable outcomes in post-electoral bargaining. These findings reveal new insights for political representations, policy outcomes, and intra-party dynamics more broadly.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Tukiainen acknowledges funding by the European Research Council (ERC, INTRAPOL, 101045239).


Last updated on 2024-28-11 at 11:57