EANM consensus document on the use of [18F]FDG PET/CT in fever and inflammation of unknown origin
: Hess Søren, Noriega-Álvarez Edel, Leccisotti Lucia, Treglia Giorgio, Albano Domenico, Roivainen Anne, Glaudemans Andor W.J.M., Gheysens Olivier
Publisher: Springer Nature
: 2024
: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
: European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
: 51
: 9
: 2597
: 2613
: 1619-7070
: 1619-7089
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06732-8(external)
: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-024-06732-8(external)
: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/393374571(external)
Purpose:
Patients with fever and inflammation of unknown origin (FUO/IUO) are clinically challenging due to variable clinical presentations with nonspecific symptoms and many differential diagnoses. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) is increasingly used in FUO and IUO, but the optimal diagnostic strategy remains controversial. This consensus document aims to assist clinicians and nuclear medicine specialists in the appropriate use of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in FUO and IUO based on current evidence.
Methods:
A working group created by the EANM infection and inflammation committee performed a systematic literature search based on PICOs with "patients with FUO/IUO" as population, "[18F]FDG-PET/CT" as intervention, and several outcomes including pre-scan characteristics, scan protocol, diagnostic yield, impact on management, prognosis, and cost-effectiveness.
Results:
We included 68 articles published from 2001 to 2023: 9 systematic reviews, 49 original papers on general adult populations, and 10 original papers on specific populations. All papers were analysed and included in the evidence-based recommendations.
Conclusion:
FUO and IUO remains a clinical challenge and [18F]FDG PET/CT has a definite role in the diagnostic pathway with an overall diagnostic yield or helpfulness in 50-60% of patients. A positive scan is often contributory by directly guiding treatment or subsequent diagnostic procedure. However, a negative scan may be equally important by excluding focal disease and predicting a favorable prognosis. Similar results are obtained in specific populations such as ICU-patients, children and HIV-patients.