A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
What explains SECA compliance: rational calculation or moral judgment?
Tekijät: Anu Lähteenmäki-Uutela, Johanna Yliskylä-Peuralahti, Sari Repka, Johan Mellqvist
Julkaisuvuosi: 2019
Journal: Wmu Journal of Maritime Affairs
Vuosikerta: 18
Numero: 1
Aloitussivu: 61
Lopetussivu: 78
Sivujen määrä: 18
ISSN: 1651-436X
eISSN: 1654-1642
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00163-1
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/39158904
We explain the Sulphur Emission Control Area (SECA) compliance through
analyzing both rational and moral factors for compliance motivation. According
to preliminary analysis based on samples and measurements, the compliance
rate for SECA is rather good and air quality has improved significantly. As
costs of compliance are rather high and penalties for non-compliance rather low
for regulation targets, moral motivation factors must be relevant for compliance.
Maintaining good relationships with control authorities and peers requires
shipowners to comply with the rules for practical and moral legitimacy. Our
interviews with Danish, Finnish and Estonian shipowners confirmed that most
of them follow the law simply because it is the law, this applying both to
current Baltic Sea SECA rules and the future global sulphur emission rules.
Obeying environmental law thus has a taken-for-granted status among shipping
companies. Almost half of the companies specifically mentioned they follow
the SECA rules because they want to take care of the environment, thus having
internalized the regulatory content. Some companies see global compliance to
depend on efficient controls.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |