A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Brain death and postmortem organ donation: report of a questionnaire from the CENTER-TBI study
Tekijät: van Veen E, van der Jagt M, Cnossen MC, Maas AIR, de Beaufort ID, Menon DK, Citerio G, Stocchetti N, Rietdijk WJR, van Dijck JTJM, Kompanje EJO; and CENTER-TBI investigators and participants
Julkaisuvuosi: 2018
Journal: Critical Care
Lehden akronyymi: Crit Care.
Vuosikerta: 22
Sivujen määrä: 11
ISSN: 1466-609X
eISSN: 1364-8535
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2241-4
Verkko-osoite: 10.1186/s13054-018-2241-4
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/Publication/38871528
BACKGROUND:
We aimed to investigate the extent of the agreement on practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation.
METHODS:Investigators from 67 Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study centers completed several questionnaires (response rate: 99%).
RESULTS:Regarding practices around brain death, we found agreement on the clinical evaluation (prerequisites and neurological assessment) for brain death determination (BDD) in 100% of the centers. However, ancillary tests were required for BDD in 64% of the centers. BDD for nondonor patients was deemed mandatory in 18% of the centers before withdrawing life-sustaining measures (LSM). Also, practices around postmortem organ donation varied. Organ donation after circulatory arrest was forbidden in 45% of the centers. When withdrawal of LSM was contemplated, in 67% of centers the patients with a ventricular drain in situ had this removed, either sometimes or all of the time.
CONCLUSIONS:This study showed both agreement and some regional differences regarding practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation. We hope our results help quantify and understand potential differences, and provide impetus for current dialogs toward further harmonization of practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
