A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Imaging Outcomes of Emergency MR Imaging in Dizziness and Vertigo: A Retrospective Cohort Study




AuthorsHapponen Tatu, Nyman Mikko, Ylikotila Pauli, Mattila Kimmo, Hirvonen Jussi

PublisherAmerican Society of Neuroradiology

Publication year2024

JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology

Journal name in sourceAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology

Journal acronymAJNR Am J Neuroradiol

Volume45

Issue6

First page 819

Last page825

ISSN0195-6108

eISSN1936-959X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8202

Web address https://www.ajnr.org/content/early/2024/04/11/ajnr.A8202

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/387718192


Abstract

Background and purpose: Patients exhibiting acute dizziness or vertigo often represent a diagnostic challenge, and many undergo neuroimaging for stroke detection. We aimed to demonstrate the imaging outcomes of first-line emergency MR imaging among patients with acute dizziness or vertigo and to determine the clinical risk factors for stroke and other acute pathology.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with acute dizziness or vertigo referred for emergency MR imaging in a tertiary hospital during 5 years. We recorded and analyzed patient characteristics, relevant clinical information, and imaging outcomes. Risk score models were derived to predict which patients were more likely to present with positive MR imaging findings.

Results: A total of 1169 patients were included. Acute stroke was found in 17%; other clinically significant pathology, in 8% of patients. In 75% of the patients, emergency MR imaging showed no significant abnormalities. Risk factors for acute stroke included older age, male sex, and a prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and neurologic signs. Isolated dizziness had no discriminative power on imaging outcomes, and 14% of these patients showed acute stroke. Risk scores had only moderate performance in predicting acute ischemic stroke (receiver operating characteristic area under curve = 0.75) or any significant pathology (receiver operating characteristic area under curve = 0.70).

Conclusions: Acute dizziness and vertigo remain challenging even when emergency MR imaging is readily available. One in 4 patients had acute pathology on MR imaging. Predictors for acute pathology (older age, male sex, cardiovascular risk factors, and neurologic signs) may aid in patient selection for MR imaging, optimizing the yield and clinical impact of emergency neuroimaging. Low diagnostic yields of CT and internal acoustic canal MR imaging may offer an opportunity to reduce health care expenditures in the future.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 12:50