A3 Refereed book chapter or chapter in a compilation book
Trust and the public vaccine debate in Finland before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Authors: Kuusipalo Aapo, Nurmi Johanna, Järvinen Katri-Maria, Vuolanto Pia
Editors: Borin Lars., Hammarlin Mia-Marie, Kokkinakis Dimitrios, Miegel Fredrik
Publishing place: Abingdon
Publication year: 2024
Book title : Vaccine Hesitancy in the Nordic Countries : Trust and Distrust During the COVID-19 Pandemic
First page : 109
Last page: 124
Number of pages: 262
ISBN: 978-1-032-30599-8
eISBN: 978-1-003-30585-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003305859-9
Web address : https://www.routledge.com/Vaccine-Hesitancy-in-the-Nordic-Countries-Trust-and-Distrust-During-the-COVID-19-Pandemic/Borin-Hammarlin-Kokkinakis-Miegel/p/book/9781032305998
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/387601132
This chapter analyses Finnish vaccine-related discourses in both mainstream media and alternative channels, with particular focus on discourses relating to hesitant and critical views and the concept of trust. Conceptual delineations between trust and confidence, as well as mistrust and distrust, are utilised to analyse the methods of building trust and orientations of non-trusting positionings. The analysis offers insight into the interplay between a vaccine-critical discourse originating amongst medical and scientific professionals and a mainstream discourse rooted in a national context characterised by high generalised trust and high vaccine uptake.
Confidence was identified as the prevalent mode of trust-building in both mainstream and alternative channels, while trust-based argumentation also played a significant role, especially in the alternative discourse. Mistrust was generally more descriptive regarding the orientation of the alternative discourse, although a temporal shift towards a more distrusting focus was also observed. The marginalising reporting practices of the mainstream discourse reflected an inherent untrustworthiness linked to vaccine-critical actors and gave little possibility for trust-constructive dialogue in Finnish public discussion.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |