A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Sparse Density, Leaf-Off Airborne Laser Scanning Data in Aboveground Biomass Component Prediction




TekijätKankare V, Vauhkonen J, Holopainen M, Vastaranta M, Hyyppa J, Hyyppa H, Alho P

KustantajaMDPI AG

Julkaisuvuosi2015

JournalForests

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiFORESTS

Lehden akronyymiForests

Vuosikerta6

Numero6

Aloitussivu1839

Lopetussivu1857

Sivujen määrä19

ISSN1999-4907

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/f6061839

Verkko-osoitehttp://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/6/6/1839


Tiivistelmä

The demand for cost-efficient forest aboveground biomass (AGB) prediction methods is growing worldwide. The National Land Survey of Finland (NLS) began collecting airborne laser scanning (ALS) data throughout Finland in 2008 to provide a new high-detailed terrain elevation model. Similar data sets are being collected in an increasing number of countries worldwide. These data sets offer great potential in forest mapping related applications. The objectives of our study were (i) to evaluate the AGB component prediction accuracy at a resolution of 300 m(2) using sparse density, leaf-off ALS data (collected by NLS) derived metrics as predictor variables; (ii) to compare prediction accuracies with existing large-scale forest mapping techniques (Multi-source National Forest Inventory, MS-NFI) based on Landsat TM satellite imagery; and (iii) to evaluate the accuracy and effect of canopy height model (CHM) derived metrics on AGB component prediction when ALS data were acquired with multiple sensors and varying scanning parameters. Results showed that ALS point metrics can be used to predict component AGBs with an accuracy of 29.7%-48.3%. AGB prediction accuracy was slightly improved using CHM-derived metrics but CHM metrics had a more clear effect on the estimated bias. Compared to the MS-NFI, the prediction accuracy was considerably higher, which was caused by differences in the remote sensing data utilized.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:14