A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

A community challenge to predict clinical outcomes after immune checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer




AuthorsMason, Mike; Lapuente-Santana, Óscar; Halkola, Anni S.; Wang, Wenyu; Mall, Raghvendra; Xiao, Xu; Kaufman, Jacob; Fu, Jingxin; Pfeil, Jacob; Banerjee, Jineta; Chung, Verena; Chang, Han; Chasalow, Scott D.; Lin, Hung Ying; Chai, Rongrong; Yu, Thomas; Finotello, Francesca; Mirtti, Tuomas; Mäyränpää, Mikko I.; Bao, Jie; Verschuren, Emmy W.; Ahmed, Eiman I.; Ceccarelli, Michele; Miller, Lance D.; Monaco, Gianni; Hendrickx, Wouter R. L.; Sherif, Shimaa; Yang, Lin; Tang, Ming; Gu, Shengqing Stan; Zhang, Wubing; Zhang, Yi; Zeng, Zexian; Das Sahu, Avinash; Liu, Yang; Yang, Wenxian; Bedognetti, Davide; Tang, Jing; Eduati, Federica; Laajala, Teemu D.; Geese, William J.; Guinney, Justin; Szustakowski, Joseph D.; Vincent, Benjamin G.; Carbone, David P.

PublisherBioMed Central

Publication year2024

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Journal name in sourceJournal of Translational Medicine

Article number190

Volume22

Issue1

eISSN1479-5876

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04705-3

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Open Access publication channel

Web address https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-023-04705-3

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/387386055

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract

Background 

Predictive biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy are currently lacking for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we describe the results from the Anti–PD-1 Response Prediction DREAM Challenge, a crowdsourced initiative that enabled the assessment of predictive models by using data from two randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of ICIs in first-line metastatic NSCLC.

Methods

Participants developed and trained models using public resources. These were evaluated with data from the CheckMate 026 trial (NCT02041533), according to the model-to-data paradigm to maintain patient confidentiality. The generalizability of the models with the best predictive performance was assessed using data from the CheckMate 227 trial (NCT02477826). Both trials were phase III RCTs with a chemotherapy control arm, which supported the differentiation between predictive and prognostic models. Isolated model containers were evaluated using a bespoke strategy that considered the challenges of handling transcriptome data from clinical trials.

Results

A total of 59 teams participated, with 417 models submitted. Multiple predictive models, as opposed to a prognostic model, were generated for predicting overall survival, progression-free survival, and progressive disease status with ICIs. Variables within the models submitted by participants included tumor mutational burden (TMB), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and gene-expression–based signatures. The best-performing models showed improved predictive power over reference variables, including TMB or PD-L1.

Conclusions 

This DREAM Challenge is the first successful attempt to use protected phase III clinical data for a crowdsourced effort towards generating predictive models for ICI clinical outcomes and could serve as a blueprint for similar efforts in other tumor types and disease states, setting a benchmark for future studies aiming to identify biomarkers predictive of ICI efficacy.

Trial registration

​​​​​​​CheckMate 026; NCT02041533, registered January 22, 2014. CheckMate 227; NCT02477826, registered June 23, 2015.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 03/03/2026 02:04:19 PM