A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Actualization of evidence-based nursing in primary, specialized, and social care settings—A cross-sectional survey




AuthorsHamari Lotta, Holopainen Arja, Nyman Johanna, Pukkila Heidi, Siltanen Hannele, Parisod Heidi

PublisherWILEY

Publishing placeHOBOKEN

Publication year2024

JournalWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

Journal name in sourceWORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING

Journal acronymWORLDV EVID-BASED NU

Volume21

Issue2

First page 137

Last page147

Number of pages11

ISSN1545-102X

eISSN1741-6787

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12701

Web address https://sigmapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/wvn.12701

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/387373411


Abstract

Background: Basing practice on evidence is a widely acknowledged requirement for nursing, but shortcomings still exist. An increased understanding of the actualization of evidence-based nursing (EBN) across different nursing contexts is needed to develop better support for EBN and promote uniform high-quality nursing.

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the actualization of EBN in different organizational contexts in Finland.

Methods: Data for this survey were collected in 2021. The actualization of EBN in primary, specialized, and social care organizations was evaluated with the Actualization of Evidence-Based Nursing instrument, nurses' version, which focuses on individual and organizational-level EBN support structures. Differences between (1) specialized and primary healthcare, and (2) different nursing practice settings were tested with Welch's two sample t-test, the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results: Based on nurse (n = 1020) evaluations, those working in specialized healthcare hold more positive attitudes toward EBN (p = .021) and evaluated their organization's methods for monitoring and evaluating nursing practices (p = .004) more positively than those working in primary healthcare. Regarding different nursing practice settings (n = 1241), the most positive results were observed within preventive healthcare where nurses evaluated their attitudes toward EBN, EBN competence, and personal evidence-based practices more positively compared to other nursing practice settings. The results were parallel regarding several organizational structures for EBN. Positive results were also observed within somatic units at university hospitals, and most negative results were within institutional care settings, health centers, and home care settings.

Linking Evidence to Action: There is a need for targeted support to strengthen EBN across different organizational contexts, with special attention to those contexts where nursing professionals with lower education levels work. Future research needs to focus on further analyzing the organizational differences and what can be learned, especially from preventive healthcare but also somatic units at university hospitals.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 10:43