A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

A Country of White Lilies: Inter-Imperial Nation-Making and Development from the Russian Empire's Periphery to Post-Ottoman Turkey




TekijätBavbek N. Yasemin, Korhonen Juho Topias

KustantajaCambridge University Press

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalComparative Studies in Society and History

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiComparative Studies in Society and History

Vuosikerta66

Numero2

Aloitussivu417

Lopetussivu442

ISSN0010-4175

eISSN1475-2999

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417523000506

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417523000506

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/387227030


Tiivistelmä

In this article, we investigate the reasons behind the puzzling enthusiastic reception of a book about Finland's national development by Turkish nationalist intellectuals in the early Republic of Turkey. Published in Turkish in 1928, the developmental model laid out in Petrov's The Country of White Lilies resonated with the Turkish intelligentsia and has remained a popular book in Turkey throughout the twentieth century, and even today. First, we compare the fictionalized developmental model presented by Petrov in his book with Finnish development under the Russian Empire, before its independence in 1917. Second, we show that this reception was largely based on a comparison of Turkey and Finland's geopolitical positions in global imperial politics, and a constructed racial affinity between the two nations in the minds of Turkish readers. Third, we argue that this national developmental model served three ideological purposes; distancing the Turkish Republic from the Ottoman Empire, showing the developmental capacity of nations outside the linear and paternalistic developmental model proposed by Western European empires, and last, presenting a model that glosses over Ottoman-Turkish state violence and ethnic cleansing, as well as democratic processes, as irrelevant to considerations of progress and development. Finally, we discuss the implications of our study for re-evaluating the sociological literature on nation formation, largely taking its "model cases"(Krause 2021) from the Western European experience, through a more encompassing inter-imperial approach (Doyle 2014).


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-26-03 at 15:08