A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) to predict mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A prospective study




TekijätPenack O, Luft T, Peczynski C, Benner A, Sica S, Arat M, Itäla-Remes M, López Corral L, Schaap NPM, Karas M, Raida L, Schroeder T, Dreger P, Metafuni E, Ozcelik T, Sandmaier BM, Kordelas L, Moiseev I, Schoemans H, Koenecke C, Basak GW, Peric Z

KustantajaBMJ Publishing Group

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalJournal for Immunotherapy of Cancer

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

Artikkelin numeroe007635

Vuosikerta12

Numero1

eISSN2051-1426

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2023-007635

Verkko-osoitehttps://jitc.bmj.com/content/12/1/e007635

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/381357133


Tiivistelmä

Background: We previously reported that the "Endothelial Activation and Stress Index" (EASIX; ((creatinine×lactate dehydrogenase)÷thrombocytes)) measured before start of conditioning predicts mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) when used as continuous score. For broad clinical implementation, a prospectively validated EASIX-pre cut-off is needed that defines a high-risk cohort and is easy to use.

Method: In the current study, we first performed a retrospective cohort analysis in n=2022 alloSCT recipients and identified an optimal cut-off for predicting non-relapse mortality (NRM) as EASIX-pre=3. For cut-off validation, we conducted a multicenter prospective study with inclusion of n=317 first alloSCTs from peripheral blood stem cell in adult patients with acute leukemia, lymphoma or myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation network.

Results: Twenty-three % (n=74) of alloSCT recipients had EASIX-pre ≥3 taken before conditioning. NRM at 2 years was 31.1% in the high EASIX group versus 11.5% in the low EASIX group (p<0.001). Patients with high EASIX-pre also had worse 2 years overall survival (51.6% vs 70.9%; p=0.002). We were able to validate the cut-off and found that EASIX ≥3 was associated with more than twofold increased risk for NRM in multivariate analysis (HR=2.18, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.94; p=0.01). No statistically significant difference could be observed for the incidence of relapse.

Conclusions: The results of this study provide a prospectively validated standard laboratory biomarker index to estimate the transplant-related mortality risk after alloSCT. EASIX ≥3 taken before conditioning identifies a population of alloSCT recipients who have a more than twofold increased risk of treatment-related mortality.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 22:55