The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel approach for measuring the polymerization shrinkage of dental resin composites – measurement of sample depth variation. This new method was compared with two testing methodologies used for assessing the polymerization shrinkage (buoyancy and strain gauge methods). Eleven commercial resin composites were investigated (EverX Posterior; EverX Flow Bulk & Dentin; G-aenial Anterior, Posterior, A'chord & Universal Injectable; Filtek One Bulk Fill & Universal Restorative; SDR + Flow and Aura Bulk Fill). In addition, filler content (wt. %), flexural modulus, and the degree of conversion were evaluated. Shrinkage values, obtained by the buoyancy method, are greater than shrinkage evaluated by the strain gauge. There are significant differences in polymerization shrinkage among the tested resin composite materials. There is a strong correlation between the newly proposed method of shrinkage measurement and the buoyancy method (r² = 0.8; p < 0.01). There is no correlation between volumetric shrinkage measurement (depth changes and buoyancy method) and linear strain measurement. Volumetric filler amount correlates with shrinkage values evaluated by all three methods. The degree of conversion for the tested resin composites ranges from 36 % to 52 %. There are some differences (around 10 %) between the filler content (wt. %) measured by the ashing-in-air method and the data given by the manufacturers. The highest flexural modulus is 14.8 GPa and the lowest 6.6 GPa. New formulations may introduce unknown relationships between the fundamental properties of dental resin composites.