A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Representation of Environmental Concepts Associated with Health Impacts in Computer Standardized Clinical Terminologies




TekijätBlock Lorraine J., Lozada-Perezmitre Erika, Cho Hwayoung, Davies Shauna, Lee Jisan, Lokmic-Tomkins Zerina, Peltonen Laura-Maria, Pruinelli Lisiane, Reid Lisa, Song Jiyoun, Topaz Maxim, von Gerich Hanna, Vyas Pankaj

KustantajaSchattauer GmbH

Julkaisuvuosi2023

JournalIMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiYearbook of medical informatics

Vuosikerta32

Numero1

Aloitussivu36

Lopetussivu47

ISSN2364-0502

eISSN2364-0502

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768746

Verkko-osoitehttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0043-1768746

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/380766436


Tiivistelmä

Objective: To evaluate the representation of environmental concepts associated with health impacts in standardized clinical terminologies.

Methods: This study used a descriptive approach with methods informed by a procedural framework for standardized clinical terminology mapping. The United Nations Global Indicator Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and Targets was used as the source document for concept extraction. The target terminologies were the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) and the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP). Manual and automated mapping methods were utilized. The lists of candidate matches were reviewed and iterated until a final mapping match list was achieved.

Results: A total of 119 concepts with 133 mapping matches were added to the final SNOMED CT list. Fifty-three (39.8%) were direct matches, 37 (27.8%) were narrower than matches, 35 (26.3%) were broader than matches, and 8 (6%) had no matches. A total of 26 concepts with 27 matches were added to the final ICNP list. Eight (29.6%) were direct matches, 4 (14.8%) were narrower than, 7 (25.9%) were broader than, and 8 (29.6%) were no matches.

Conclusion: Following this evaluation, both strengths and gaps were identified. Gaps in terminology representation included concepts related to cost expenditures, affordability, community engagement, water, air and sanitation. The inclusion of these concepts is necessary to advance the clinical reporting of these environmental and sustainability indicators. As environmental concepts encoded in standardized terminologies expand, additional insights into data and health conditions, research, education, and policy-level decision-making will be identified.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 12:19