A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

University language students’ evaluations of ecological, social, cultural and economic sustainability and their importance in language teaching




TekijätKuusalu Salla-Riikka, Laine Päivi, Maijala Minna, Mutta Maarit, Patzelt Mareen

KustantajaEmerald publishing

KustannuspaikkaLeeds, England, United Kingdom

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalInternational Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education

Lehden akronyymiIJSHE

Vuosikerta25

Numero9

eISSN1467-6370

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2023-0169

Verkko-osoitehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2023-0169

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/380667909


Tiivistelmä
Purpose

This study aims to explore how university language students evaluate different sustainability themes and examine the overall relevance of ecological, social, cultural and economic sustainability dimensions in language education.

Design/methodology/approach

A questionnaire was designed to study Finnish university language students’ (n = 55) order of priority for sustainability dimensions and their sub-themes and the justifications for the priority orders using a mixed methods design. Qualitative content analysis was conducted using NVivo software, and weighted rankings were used to analyse the quantitative data.

Findings

The findings of the study showed that language students evaluated the social and cultural dimensions as the most relevant in language teaching. In all dimensions, students approached sustainability mainly by prioritising larger issues and advancing towards smaller ones. Most non-directional responses appeared in the economic dimension. In addition, individual prioritising and justification approaches varied between different sustainability dimensions.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous studies have examined language students’ evaluations of and justifications for all four sustainability dimensions. The results highlight the need to use multiple, holistic approaches and systems thinking to incorporate education for sustainable development.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 11:41