Feasibility of a checklist in treating hypertension in primary care – base line results from a cluster-randomised controlled trial (check and support)
: Aapo Tahkola, Päivi Korhonen, Hannu Kautiainen, Teemu Niiranen, Pekka Mäntyselkä
: 2018
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
: 240
: 18
: 11
: 1471-2261
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0963-5
: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/37084960
Background
Most patients with 
antihypertensive medication do not achieve their blood pressure (BP) 
target. The most important factor behind this failure is poor medication
 adherence. However, non-adherence to therapy does not concern only 
patients. Clinicians also tend to lack adherence to hypertension 
guidelines, overestimate BP control and be satisfied with inadequate BP 
control. The aim of this non-blinded, cluster-randomised, controlled 
study was to investigate if using a checklist would improve the quality 
of care in the initiation of new antihypertensive medication and help 
reduce non-adherence.
Methods
The study was conducted in eight primary care study centres in Central Finland, randomised to function as either intervention (n = 4)
 or control sites (n = 4). We included patients aged 30–75 years who 
were prescribed antihypertensive medication for the first time. 
Initiation of medication in the intervention group was carried out with a
 9-item checklist, filled in together by the treating physician and the 
patient. Hypertension treatment in the control group was managed by the 
treating physician without a study-specific protocol.
Results
In total, 119 patients were included in the study, of which 118 were included in the analysis (n = 59
 in the control group, n = 59 in the intervention group). When 
initiating antihypertensive medication, an adequate BP target was set 
for 19% of the patients in the control group and for 68% in the 
intervention group. Shortly after the appointment, only 14% of the 
patients in the control group were able to remember the adequate BP 
target, compared with 32% in the intervention group. The use of the 
checklist was also related to more regular agreement on the next 
follow-up appointment (64% in the control group versus 95% in the 
intervention group). No adverse events or side effects were related to 
the intervention.
Conclusions
Even highly motivated new 
hypertensive patients in Finnish primary care have significant gaps in 
their informational and behavioural skills. The use of a checklist for 
initiation of antihypertensive medication was related to significant 
improvement in these skills. Based on our findings, the use of a 
checklist might be a practical tool for addressing this problem.