A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Supraspecific names in spider systematic and their nomenclatural problems [Supraspezifische namen in der spinnensystematik und ihre nomenklatorischen probleme]
Authors: Yuri M. Marusik
Publisher: Arachnologische Gesellschaft e.V.
Publication year: 2018
Journal: Arachnologische Mitteilungen: Arachnology Letters
Journal name in source: Arachnologische Mitteilungen
Volume: 2018
Issue: 55
First page : 42
Last page: 45
ISSN: 1018-4171
eISSN: 2199-7233
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30963/aramit5507
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/32157120
Three different types of the names used in spider systematics are
recognized and discussed: 1) typified taxonomic names, 2) non-typified
taxonomic names, and 3) non-taxonomic names. Typified names are those
from genus to superfamily group names; they are regulated by the ICZN.
Non-typified names are used for taxonomic groups higher than
superfamilies (e.g., Haplogynae, Mesothelae, etc.); they are not
regulated by the ICZN but have an authorship, a fixed year of
publication and are incorporated in a hierarchical classification.
Non-taxonomic names are not regulated by any formal rules, unranked,
have no authorship or description, and are non-typified. Some
difficulties connected with the non-typified names in spider systematics
are briefly discussed. Senior synonyms of some non-typified and
non-taxonomic names are discussed, and suggestions are given on how to
deal with the non-typified names lacking senior synonyms.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
