A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

What constitutes the surface approach to learning in the light of new empirical evidence?




AuthorsSari Lindblom-Ylänne, Anna Parpala, Liisa Postareff

PublisherRoutledge

Publication year2019

JournalStudies in Higher Education

Journal name in sourceStudies in Higher Education

Volume44

Issue12

First page 2183

Last page2195

eISSN1470-174X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1482267

Web address https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2018.1482267

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/32101341


Abstract

This study aims, firstly, to examine the nature of the surface approach to learning in today’s university context, and secondly, to explore the factors that explain variations in the use of this approach. The 61 participants were studying in six Bachelor programmes representing various disciplines. These students scored above average on a surface approach scale and volunteered to be interviewed. One compulsory course was selected from each programme. Five surface approach profiles emerged showing variation from a full surface approach to a deep approach with memorisation. Despite very similar high scores on the surface approach scale, students varied in their use of surface-level processes. Thus, the inventory data did not capture the full variation in the students’ use of the surface approach to learning. Rich research methods are therefore needed to better understand the nature of students’ personal aims as well as their study processes and practices.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 18:12