A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Spoken words are processed during dexmedetomidine-induced unresponsiveness




AuthorsKallionpää R.E., Scheinin A., Kallionpää R.A., Sandman N., Kallioinen M., Laitio R., Laitio T., Kaskinoro K., Kuusela T., Revonsuo A., Scheinin H., Valli K.

PublisherELSEVIER SCI LTD

Publication year2018

JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia

Journal name in sourceBRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA

Journal acronymBRIT J ANAESTH

Volume121

Issue1

First page 270

Last page280

Number of pages11

ISSN0007-0912

eISSN1471-6771

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.032

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/31974879


Abstract

Background: Studying the effects of anaesthetic drugs on the processing of semantic stimuli could yield insights into how brain functions change in the transition from wakefulness to unresponsiveness. Here, we explored the N400 event-related potential during dexmedetomidine- and propofol-induced unresponsiveness.

Methods: Forty-seven healthy subjects were randomised to receive either dexmedetomidine (n = 23) or propofol (n = 24) in this open-label parallel-group study. Loss of responsiveness was achieved by stepwise increments of pseudo-steady-state plasma concentrations, and presumed loss of consciousness was induced using 1.5 times the concentration required for loss of responsiveness. Pre-recorded spoken sentences ending either with an expected (congruous) or an unexpected (incongruous) word were presented during unresponsiveness. The resulting electroencephalogram data were analysed for the presence of the N400 component, and for the N400 effect defined as the difference between the N400 components elicited by congruous and incongruous stimuli, in the time window 300-600 ms post-stimulus. Recognition of the presented stimuli was tested after recovery of responsiveness.

Results: The N400 effect was not observed during dexmedetomidine- or propofol-induced unresponsiveness. The N400 component, however, persisted during dexmedetomidine administration. The N400 component elicited by congruous stimuli during unresponsiveness in the dexmedetomidine group resembled the large component evoked by incongruous stimuli at the awake baseline. After recovery, no recognition of the stimuli heard during unresponsiveness occurred.

Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine and propofol disrupt the discrimination of congruous and incongruous spoken sentences, and recognition memory at loss of responsiveness. However, the processing of words is partially preserved during dexmedetomidine-induced unresponsiveness.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:27