A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Cranioplasty After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Effects of Trauma and Patient Recovery on Cranioplasty Outcome




AuthorsJussi P. Posti, Matias Yli-Olli, Lauri Heiskanen, Kalle M. J. Aitasalo, Jaakko Rinne, Ville Vuorinen, Willy Serlo, Olli Tenovuo, Pekka K. Vallittu, Jaakko M. Piitulainen

PublisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SA

Publication year2018

JournalFrontiers in Neurology

Journal name in sourceFRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY

Journal acronymFRONT NEUROL

Article numberARTN 223

Volume9

Number of pages7

ISSN1664-2295

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00223

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/29618439


Abstract
Background: In patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) treated with decompressive craniectomy (DC), factors affecting the success of later cranioplasty are poorly known.Objective: We sought to investigate if injury- and treatment-related factors, and state of recovery could predict the risk of major complications in cranioplasty requiring implant removal, and how these complications affect the outcome.Methods: A retrospective cohort of 40 patients with DC following sTBI and subsequent cranioplasty was studied. Non-injury-related factors were compared with a reference population of 115 patients with DC due to other conditions.Results: Outcome assessed 1 day before cranioplasty did not predict major complications leading to implant removal. Successful cranioplasty was associated with better outcome, whereas a major complication attenuates patient recovery: in patients with favorable outcome assessed 1 year after cranioplasty, major complication rate was 7%, while in patients with unfavorable outcome the rate was 42% (p = 0.003). Of patients with traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) on admission imaging 30% developed a major complication, while none of patients without tSAH had a major complication (p = 0.014). Other imaging findings, age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale, extracranial injuries, length of stay at intensive care unit, cranioplasty materials, and timing of cranioplasty were not associated with major complications.Conclusion: A successful cranioplasty after sTBI and DC predicts favorable outcome 1 year after cranioplasty, while stage of recovery before cranioplasty does not predict cranioplasty success or failure. tSAH on admission imaging is a major risk factor for a major complication leading to implant removal.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 14:13