A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

IRT analyses of the Swedish Dark Triad Dirty Dozen




AuthorsDanilo Garcia, Björn N. Persson, Ali Al Nima, Joel Gruneau Brulin, Max Rapp-Ricciardi, Petri J. Kajonius

PublisherElsevier Ltd.

Publication year2018

JournalHeliyon

Volume4

Issue3

Number of pages13

ISSN2405-8440

eISSN2405-8440

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00569

Web address https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844018307680?via=ihub

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/30772038


Abstract

Background: The Dark Triad (i.e., Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) can be captured quickly with 12 items using the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen (Jonason and Webster, 2010). Previous Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses of the original English Dark Triad Dirty Dozen have shown that all three subscales adequately tap into the dark domains of personality. The aim of the present study was to analyze the Swedish version of the

Method: 570 individuals (nmales = 326, nfemales = 242, and 2 unreported), including university students and white-collar workers with an age range between 19 and 65 years, responded to the Swedish version of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen (Garcia et al., 2017a,b).

Results: Contrary to previous research, we found that the narcissism scale provided most information, followed by psychopathy, and finally Machiavellianism. Moreover, the psychopathy scale required a higher level of the latent trait for endorsement of its items than the narcissism and Machiavellianism scales. Overall, all items provided reasonable amounts of information and are thus effective for discriminating between individuals. The mean item discriminations (alphas) were 1.92 for Machiavellianism, 2.31 for narcissism, and 1.99 for psychopathy.

Conclusion: This is the first study to provide IRT analyses of the Swedish version of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen. Our findings add to a growing literature on the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen scale in different cultures and highlight psychometric characteristics, which can be used for comparative studies. Items tapping into psychopathy showed higher thresholds for endorsement than the other two scales. Importantly, the narcissism scale seems to provide more information about a lack of narcissism, perhaps mirroring cultural conditions.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:52