A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
How scientists perceive the evolutionary origin of human traits: Results of a survey study
Tekijät: Hanna Tuomisto, Matleena Tuomisto, Jouni T. Tuomisto
Kustantaja: WILEY
Julkaisuvuosi: 2018
Journal: Ecology and Evolution
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Lehden akronyymi: ECOL EVOL
Vuosikerta: 8
Numero: 6
Aloitussivu: 3518
Lopetussivu: 3533
Sivujen määrä: 16
ISSN: 2045-7758
eISSN: 2045-7758
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3887
Verkko-osoite: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ece3.3887
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/30411992
Various hypotheses have been proposed for why the traits distinguishing humans from other primates originally evolved, and any given trait may have been explained both as an adaptation to different environments and as a result of demands from social organization or sexual selection. To find out how popular the different explanations are among scientists, we carried out an online survey among authors of recent scientific papers in journals covering relevant fields of science (paleoanthropology, paleontology, ecology, evolution, human biology). Some of the hypotheses were clearly more popular among the 1,266 respondents than others, but none was universally accepted or rejected. Even the most popular of the hypotheses were assessed very likely by <50% of the respondents, but many traits had 1-3 hypotheses that were found at least moderately likely by >70% of the respondents. An ordination of the hypotheses identified two strong gradients. Along one gradient, the hypotheses were sorted by their popularity, measured by the average credibility score given by the respondents. The second gradient separated all hypotheses postulating adaptation to swimming or diving into their own group. The average credibility scores given for different subgroups of the hypotheses were not related to respondent's age or number of publications authored. However, (paleo)anthropologists were more critical of all hypotheses, and much more critical of the water-related ones, than were respondents representing other fields of expertise. Although most respondents did not find the water-related hypotheses likely, only a small minority found them unscientific. The most popular hypotheses were based on inherent drivers; that is, they assumed the evolution of a trait to have been triggered by the prior emergence of another human-specific behavioral or morphological trait, but opinions differed as to which of the traits came first.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
