A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Learning how to understand complexity and deal with sustainability challenges – A framework for a comprehensive approach and its application in university education




AuthorsR. Willamo, L. Helenius, C. Holmström, L. Haapanen, V. Sandström, E. Huotari,
K. Kaarre, U. Värre, A. Nuotiomäki, J. Happonen, L. Kolehmainen

PublisherElsevier

Publication year2018

JournalEcological Modelling

Volume370

Issue24 February 2018

First page 1

Last page13

Number of pages13

ISSN0304-3800

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.011

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.12.011

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/29249510


Abstract

Sustainability challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss,
poverty and rapid urbanization are complex and strongly interrelated. In
order to successfully deal with these challenges, we need comprehensive
approaches that integrate knowledge from multiple disciplines and
perspectives and emphasize interconnections. In short, they aid in
observing matters in a wider perspective without losing an understanding
of the details. In order to teach and learn a comprehensive approach,
we need to better understand what comprehensive thinking actually is. In
this paper, we present a conceptual framework for a comprehensive
approach, termed the GHH framework. The framework comprises three
dimensions: generalism, holism, and holarchism. It contributes to the
academic community’s understanding of comprehensive thinking and it can
be used for integrating comprehensive thinking into education. Also,
practical examples of the application of the framework in university
teaching are presented. We argue that an ideal approach to
sustainability challenges and complexity in general is a balanced,
dialectical combination of comprehensive and differentiative approaches.
The current dominance of specialization, or the differentiative
approach, in university education calls for a stronger emphasis on
comprehensive thinking skills. Comprehensiveness should not be
considered as a flawed approach, but should instead be considered as
important an aspect in education as specialized and differentiative
skills.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 17:32