A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Competence Assessment Instruments in Perianesthesia Nursing Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature
Tekijät: Jeon Y, Lakanmaa RL, Meretoja R, Leino-Kilpi H
Kustantaja: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Julkaisuvuosi: 2017
Journal: Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING
Lehden akronyymi: J PERIANESTH NURS
Vuosikerta: 32
Numero: 6
Aloitussivu: 542
Lopetussivu: 556
Sivujen määrä: 15
ISSN: 1089-9472
eISSN: 1532-8473
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2016.09.008
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/28730678
Purpose: To identify competence assessment instruments in perianesthesia nursing care and to describe the validity and reliability of the instruments.Design: A scoping review in a systematic manner.Methods: A search in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and ERIC was carried out to identify empirical studies from 1994 to 2015. A narrative synthesis approach was undertaken to analyze the data.Findings: Nine competence assessment instruments in perianesthesia nursing care were identified. The instruments used three types of data collection methods: Self-report, observation, and written examinations. The most commonly reported validity method was content validity involving expert panels and reliability tests for internal consistency and inter-rater's consistency.Conclusions: Integrating more than one data collection method may give support to overcoming some of the limitations, such as lack of objectivity and misinterpretation of the assessment results. In an ever-changing environment, perianesthesia nursing competence requires constant reassessment from the perspective of content validity, scoring methods, and reliability.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
