A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Phylogenetic relationships of millipedes in the subclass Penicillata (Diplopoda) with a key to the genera
Authors: Megan Short, Varpu Vahtera
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Publication year: 2017
Journal: Journal of Natural History
Volume: 51
Issue: 41-42
First page : 2443
Last page: 2461
Number of pages: 19
ISSN: 0022-2933
eISSN: 1464-5262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.1380241
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.1380241
Bristly millipedes (subclass Penicillata, order Polyxenida) are minute
diplopods characterised by uncalcified cuticle and a body covered
with unique tufts of bristles. The order is found worldwide and comprises
less than 200 described species divided into three families, with
many of the species and genera being poorly known. The first evolutionary
analysis of the order presented here utilises both molecular
(COI, 18S rRNA and 16S rRNA) and morphological data to examine
monophyly of the families and subfamilies and the evolutionary relationships
between them. Maximum likelihood analysis was based on
molecular data only, whereas parsimony analyses were based on
molecular data as well as combined morphological and molecular
data. The results of these analyses with two different optimality criteria
were incongruent in many aspects. Unlike parsimony, the likelihood
result found strong support for a basal position of the family
Synxenidae and separation of the order into two monophyletic clades
corresponding to the two superfamilies Synxenoidea, containing the
family Synxenidae, and Polyxenoidea, containing the families
Polyxenidae and Lophoproctidae. Parsimony results did not support
the existence of the two superfamilies. Both analyses resolved the
family Synxenidae as monophyletic and Polyxenidae as polyphyletic,
whereas the family Lophoproctidae was shown to be paraphyletic in
likelihood and monophyletic in parsimony analysis. The subfamilies
Monographinae and Polyxeninae were found to be monophyletic in
the likelihood tree but parsimony suggested paraphyly of both. The
results suggest that further revision of the systematics of the
Polyxenida may be necessary. However, a much larger molecular
data set will be necessary to clarify and provide stronger nodal support
for phylogenetic trees and to confirm the relationships, particularly of
the families Polyxenidae and Lophoproctidae. Molecular identification
is likely to be an important tool for this taxonomically challenging
order in future. A simplified key to the genera is provided.