A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Load-bearing capacity and fracture behavior of glass fiber-reinforced composite cranioplasty implants




TekijätJaakko M. Piitulainen, Riina Mattila, Niko Moritz, Pekka K. Vallittu

KustantajaWICHTIG PUBLISHING

Julkaisuvuosi2017

JournalJournal of Applied Biomaterials and Functional Materials

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiJOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMATERIALS & FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS

Lehden akronyymiJ APPL BIOMATER FUNC

Vuosikerta15

Numero4

AloitussivuE356

LopetussivuE361

Sivujen määrä6

ISSN2280-8000

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000375

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/27773239


Tiivistelmä
Background: Glass fiber-reinforced composites (FRCs) have been adapted for routine clinical use in various dental restorations and are presently also used in cranial implants. The aim of this study was to measure the load-bearing capacity and failure type of glass FRC implants during static loading with and without interconnective bars and with different fixation modes.Methods: Load-bearing capacities of 2 types of FRC implants with 4 different fixation modes were experimentally tested. The sandwich-like FRC implants were made of 2 sheets of woven FRC fabric, which consisted of silanized, woven E-glass fiber fabrics impregnated in BisGMA-TEGDMA monomer resin matrix. The space between the outer and inner surfaces was filled with glass particles. All FRC implants were tested up to a 10-mm deflection with load-bearing capacity determined at 6-mm deflection. The experimental groups were compared using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis with Steel-Dwass post hoc test.Results: FRC implants underwent elastic and plastic deformation until 6-mm deflection. The loading test did not demonstrate any protrusions of glass fibers or cut fiber even at 10-mm deflection. An elastic and plastic deformation of the implant occurred until the FRC sheets were separated from each other. In the cases of the freestanding setup (no fixation) and the fixation with 6 screws, the FRC implants with 2 interconnective bars showed a significantly higher load-bearing capacity compared with the implant without interconnective bars.Conclusions: FRC implants used in this study showed a load-bearing capacity which may provide protection for the brain after cranial bone defect reconstruction.

Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 19:41