A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Finnish multiple sclerosis patients




AuthorsEija Rosti-Otajärvi, Päivi Hämäläinen, Anna Wiksten, Tanja Hakkarainen, Juhani Ruutiainen

PublisherWiley Open Access

Publication year2017

JournalBrain and Behavior

Volume7

Issue7

Number of pages8

ISSN2162-3279

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.725

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/26534916


Abstract
Background

Fatigue is one of the most debilitating symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS) considerably interfering with patients’ daily functioning. Both researchers and clinicians need psychometrically robust methods to evaluate fatigue in MS.

Objectives

The objective of this study was (i) to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and (ii) to describe the results among patients with MS.

Methods

In total, 553 patients with MS (mean age, 53.8 years; standard deviation [SD], 11.4; 79% women: mean patient-defined disease severity, Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] 4.0, SD, 2.5) completed the self-administered questionnaires including the FSS. A standard procedure was used for the translation of the FSS.

Results

The mean (SD) score for the FSS was 4.5 (1.7); in 65% of the patients, the score was ≥4.0. The data quality of the FSS was excellent, with 99.6% of computable scale scores. Floor and ceiling effects were minimal. The FSS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.95). Unidimensionality was supported based on confirmatory factor analysis with the comparative fit index being 0.94. The FSS showed moderate/high correlations with the perceived burden of the disease, quality of life and disease severity, whereas, age or gender did not have a significant effect on the FSS score.

Conclusions

The Finnish version of the FSS showed satisfactory reliability and validity and thus can be regarded as a feasible measure of self-reported fatigue.



Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 19:12