Compensated sex-integrated individual competitions in ski jumping: a response to Hämäläinen



: Arvi Pakaslahti

Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD

: 2017

: Sport, Ethics and Philosophy

: SPORT ETHICS AND PHILOSOPHY

: SPORT ETHICS PHILOS

: 11

: 2

: 219

: 223

: 5

: 1751-1321

: 1751-133X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2016.1272130

: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17511321.2016.1272130#aHR0cDovL3d3dy50YW5kZm9ubGluZS5jb20vZG9pL3BkZi8xMC4xMDgwLzE3NTExMzIxLjIwMTYuMTI3MjEzMD9uZWVkQWNjZXNzPXRydWVAQEAw


In this paper, I criticize Mika Hamalainen's recent argument for compensated sex-integrated individual competitions in ski jumping. I argue that Hamalainen's argument is problematic at least in four different ways. Two of my criticisms are intended to show that Hamalainen ignores some important considerations which he should have discussed. On the other hand, I also argue that Hamalainen's argument is inherently flawed in two respects.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 20:45