A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Desired vis-à-vis required interim disclosures




AuthorsSchadewitz HJ, Kanto AJ, Kahra HA, Blevins DR

PublisherEmerald (MCB UP )

Publishing placeRussell House, 28/30 Little Russell Street, London WC 1A 2HN, UK

Publication year2000

JournalJournal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

Journal name in sourceJournal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

Article number7

Volume8

Issue2

First page 170

Last page179

Number of pages10

ISSN1358-1988

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/eb025041

Web address http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb025041


Abstract

This study compares those interim disclosures that managers desire to make with those they are required to make. Managers and regulators agree on the optimal degree of disclosure on growth potential and size. It appears that the less managers voluntarily disclose, the greater the firm´s growth potential. This may be because managers feel that other evidence signals the good future prospects or the information indicating positive growth is too proprietary to reveal to competitors. Some differences are observed. Managers would pay more attention to the specific needs of their governance groups. Regulations would require more disclosure of variables indicating: business risk; capital structure; and growth. These differences in perceived need for disclosure highlight the imporntance of continued study of the optimal scope and scale of disclosure.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 12:35