A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Performance measurement in universities: ambiguities in the use of quality versus quantity in performance indicators
Tekijät: Kallio KM, Kallio TJ, Grossi G
Kustantaja: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Julkaisuvuosi: 2017
Journal: Public Money and Management
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT
Lehden akronyymi: PUBLIC MONEY MANAGE
Vuosikerta: 37
Numero: 4
Aloitussivu: 293
Lopetussivu: 300
Sivujen määrä: 8
ISSN: 0954-0962
eISSN: 1467-9302
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1295735
Tiivistelmä
Performance measurement (PM) is now common in Western universities. This is also the case in Finland, where a new funding scheme was implemented to ensure that quality was included in universities' PM. However, this paper shows that the quality indicators in use are, in practice, quantitative. The paper is based on a large survey and has implications for university PM systems in Finland and internationally.
Performance measurement (PM) is now common in Western universities. This is also the case in Finland, where a new funding scheme was implemented to ensure that quality was included in universities' PM. However, this paper shows that the quality indicators in use are, in practice, quantitative. The paper is based on a large survey and has implications for university PM systems in Finland and internationally.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali