A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Some remarks on the concept of proportionality
Tekijät: Nurmi H
Kustantaja: SPRINGER
Julkaisuvuosi: 2014
Journal: Annals of Operations Research
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Lehden akronyymi: ANN OPER RES
Vuosikerta: 215
Numero: 1
Aloitussivu: 231
Lopetussivu: 244
Sivujen määrä: 14
ISSN: 0254-5330
eISSN: 1572-9338
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1252-9
Verkko-osoite: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-012-1252-9
Tiivistelmä
Proportionality plays a role in many principles of fairness or justice. In particular, it is often invoked in electoral systems aiming at a similarity of opinion distributions in the parliament and in the electorate at large. The proportional systems of representation (PR systems, for short) strive for maximal similarity between these two distributions. Unfortunately, the concept of proportionality is imprecise in two senses: it is vague and ambiguous. In other words, once a clear criterion of what we mean by proportionality is given, different PR systems may differ in the degree of proportionality achieved in any given election. This is what will be referred to as the vagueness of proportionality (of election outcomes). Proportionality is, however, also ambiguous in that it refers to different things depending on how the voters are expected to signal their opinions and on what is it that one wishes to distribute proportionally.
Proportionality plays a role in many principles of fairness or justice. In particular, it is often invoked in electoral systems aiming at a similarity of opinion distributions in the parliament and in the electorate at large. The proportional systems of representation (PR systems, for short) strive for maximal similarity between these two distributions. Unfortunately, the concept of proportionality is imprecise in two senses: it is vague and ambiguous. In other words, once a clear criterion of what we mean by proportionality is given, different PR systems may differ in the degree of proportionality achieved in any given election. This is what will be referred to as the vagueness of proportionality (of election outcomes). Proportionality is, however, also ambiguous in that it refers to different things depending on how the voters are expected to signal their opinions and on what is it that one wishes to distribute proportionally.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali