A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Risk of donor-site lymphatic vessel dysfunction after microvascular lymph node transfer




TekijätSulo E, Hartiala P, Viitanen T, Mäki M, Seppänen M, Saarikko A

KustantajaElsevier Ltd

Julkaisuvuosi2015

JournalJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

Lehden akronyymiJ Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

Vuosikerta68

Numero4

Aloitussivu551

Lopetussivu558

Sivujen määrä8

ISSN1748-6815

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.11.016

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/2168654


Tiivistelmä

BACKGROUND:

Microvascular lymph node transfer has been used to improve lymphatic function in patients with lymphoedema. We previously reported changes in the lymphatic function of the donor limb after lymph node transfer. For this reason, we modified our surgical method to be more conservative.



SUBJECTS AND METHODS:

Microvascular lymph node transfer was performed in 13 patients using the previously reported original method. Sixteen patients were operated upon using the more conservative modified method. Lymphatic function in the donor limb was evaluated using volumetry, lymphoscintigraphy and tissue water percentage.



RESULTS:

In the original method group, the donor-limb volume was on average greater (199 ± 540 ml) than in the non-operated control limb. The volume difference between the limbs was smaller (151 ± 463 ml) in the modified method group. Two patients in the original method group had abnormal transport index (Ti) values in lymphoscintigraphy indicating decreased lymphatic function of the donor limb. In the modified method group, the Ti-values remained normal. The tissue water percentage of the donor limb was on average 40% ± 4% in the original method group and 40% ± 3% in the modified method group. Importantly, none of the patients in either group developed clinical lymphoedema in the donor limb during the 11-84-month follow-up.



CONCLUSIONS:

Even with the more conservative lymph node transfer method, we can observe slight, subclinical signs of lymphatic dysfunction in the donor limb. These results highlight the importance of minimizing the surgical exploration in the inguinal area and avoiding damage to the lymphatic vessels or sentinel nodes draining the lower limb.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 11:51