A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Decision malting of nurses practicing in intensive care in Canada, Finland, Northern Ireland, Switzerland, and the United States
Tekijät: Lauri S, Salantera S, Callister LC, Harrisson S, Kappeli S, MacLeod M
Kustantaja: MOSBY-YEAR BOOK INC
Julkaisuvuosi: 1998
Lehti:: Heart and Lung
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: HEART & LUNG
Lehden akronyymi: HEART LUNG
Vuosikerta: 27
Numero: 2
Aloitussivu: 133
Lopetussivu: 142
Sivujen määrä: 10
ISSN: 0147-9563
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9563(98)90021-8
Tiivistelmä
In this study, our intention was to describe the decision making of nurses practicing in intensive care, and the differences of nurses' decision making in Canada, Finland, Northern Ireland, Switzerland, and the United States. The instrument used in the study was a 56-item Likert-type questionnaire that has been used in previous studies and has proved to be a reliable tool. The target group comprised a nonrandom sample of nurses (N = 314) from five countries. The samples are not representative; therefore, the results in these cases cannot be generalized. The results showed that the decision making of nurses practicing in intensive care was broadly based, and that there were some country differences in data collection, problem definition, and planning. In contrast, decision making related to the implementation and evaluation of nursing is quite similar in the different countries. Canada and the United Slates on the one hand, and Finland, Northern Ireland, and Switzerland on the other, showed more similarities with each other in data collection, problem definition, and nursing planning related to decision making. Neither experience nor nurse's knowledge structure was associated with different decision-making approaches.
In this study, our intention was to describe the decision making of nurses practicing in intensive care, and the differences of nurses' decision making in Canada, Finland, Northern Ireland, Switzerland, and the United States. The instrument used in the study was a 56-item Likert-type questionnaire that has been used in previous studies and has proved to be a reliable tool. The target group comprised a nonrandom sample of nurses (N = 314) from five countries. The samples are not representative; therefore, the results in these cases cannot be generalized. The results showed that the decision making of nurses practicing in intensive care was broadly based, and that there were some country differences in data collection, problem definition, and planning. In contrast, decision making related to the implementation and evaluation of nursing is quite similar in the different countries. Canada and the United Slates on the one hand, and Finland, Northern Ireland, and Switzerland on the other, showed more similarities with each other in data collection, problem definition, and nursing planning related to decision making. Neither experience nor nurse's knowledge structure was associated with different decision-making approaches.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali