A2 Refereed review article in a scientific journal

How to recognize and measure the economic impacts of environmental regulation: The Sulphur Emission Control Area case




AuthorsLähteenmäki-Uutela Anu, Repka Sari, Haukioja Teemu, Pohjola Tuomas

PublisherElsevier

Publication year2017

JournalJournal of Cleaner Production

Volume154

First page 553

Last page565

Number of pages13

ISSN0959-6526

eISSN1879-1786

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.224

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.224


Abstract

How does environmental regulation impact the performance of economies? Scientific literature on
impact assessments on environmental regulation are analysed in this article, focusing on the ex-ante
studies on the Sulphur Emission Control Area (SECA) in the Baltic Sea and North Sea. The SECA regulations
on shipping exhaust gases are an example that may appear to be straightforward, but on closer
inspection, this is a multifaceted issue that has several aspects that are difficult to measure and balance
against each other. As such, it offers a good case example to categorize and conceptualize the questions of
impact assessment. The SECA regulations are aimed at creating environmental and health benefits, and
presumed to incur compliance costs. Other benefits and costs have not received much attention. Macroeconomic effects and the issues of international distribution of costs and benefits are often neglected.
The relevant impact categories for the SECA regulations are identified and discussed systematically. We
propose a comprehensive regulation impact framework for socio-economic effects that can be extended to
other environmental regulation to support the needs of consistent and reliable evidence-based maritime
policy.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 15:55